JBL ES 150PW (serv.man3) EMC - CB Certificate ▷ View online
Report No:W-N-1002010-CY-01-1
Telecom Technology Center
5
4. Test Equipments
Manufacturer /
Name of Instrument
Model No
serial No
Next cal. Date
Agilent/
ESA Spectrum Analyzer
ESA Spectrum Analyzer
E4402B MY45103865
MAY/03/11
Agilent/
ESG Vector Signal Generator
ESG Vector Signal Generator
E4438C MY45091105
DEC/08/11
Agilent/
ESG Vector Signal Generator
ESG Vector Signal Generator
E4438C MY45091008
DEC/08/11
Audio Precision/
Audio Test System
Audio Test System
ATS1-Access ATS1-45429
OCT/29/10
ShibaSoku/
Multi Test Signal Generator
Multi Test Signal Generator
TG39AC 3000021449
OCT/29/10
Agilent/
RF Signal Generator
RF Signal Generator
N9310A CN0115000344
JUL/24/10
Agilent/
Attenuator/Switch Driver
Attenuator/Switch Driver
11713A MY44321028
N.C.R
Agilent/
Switch/Control System
Switch/Control System
3499B MY42000577
N.C.R
Schwarzbeck/
Trilog-Broadband Antenna
Trilog-Broadband Antenna
VULB 9163
N/A
JUL/15/10
Max-Full/
Positioning Controller
Positioning Controller
886 N/A N.C.R
OPHIR RF/
RF Power Amplifier
RF Power Amplifier
5127F 1049
N.C.R
SCHAFFNER/
ESD System
ESD System
NSG438 750
JUL/15/10
EMC PARTNER/
Transient 2000IN6
Transient 2000IN6
Transient 2000
JUN/24/10
NOTE: 1. The test was performed in EN55020 Test Room.
2. The calibration interval of the above test instruments is 12 months and the
calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC. Immunity requirements
calibrations are traceable to NML/ROC. Immunity requirements
Report No:W-N-1002010-CY-01-1
Telecom Technology Center
6
5. Performance criteria
Criterion A
The equipment shall continue to operate as intended without
operator intervention. No degradation of performance or loss of
function is allowed below a performance level specified by the
manufacturer when the equipment is used as intended. The
performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of
performance.
If the minimum performance level or the permissible
performance loss is not specified by the manufacturer, then
either of these may be derived from the product description and
documentation, and by what the user product description and
documentation, and by what the user may reasonably expect
from the equipment if used as intended.
operator intervention. No degradation of performance or loss of
function is allowed below a performance level specified by the
manufacturer when the equipment is used as intended. The
performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of
performance.
If the minimum performance level or the permissible
performance loss is not specified by the manufacturer, then
either of these may be derived from the product description and
documentation, and by what the user product description and
documentation, and by what the user may reasonably expect
from the equipment if used as intended.
Criterion B
After the test, the equipment shall continue to operate as
intended without operator Intervention. No degradation of
performance or loss of function is allowed, after the application
of the phenomenon below a performance level specified by the
manufacturer, when the equipment is used as intended. The
Performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of
performance.
During the test, degradation of performance is allowed.
However, no change of operating state if stored data allowed to
persist after the test. If the minimum performance level (or the
permissible performance loss ) is not specified by the
manufacturer, then either of these may be derived from the
product description and documentation, and by what the user
may reasonably expect from the equipment if used as intended.
intended without operator Intervention. No degradation of
performance or loss of function is allowed, after the application
of the phenomenon below a performance level specified by the
manufacturer, when the equipment is used as intended. The
Performance level may be replaced by a permissible loss of
performance.
During the test, degradation of performance is allowed.
However, no change of operating state if stored data allowed to
persist after the test. If the minimum performance level (or the
permissible performance loss ) is not specified by the
manufacturer, then either of these may be derived from the
product description and documentation, and by what the user
may reasonably expect from the equipment if used as intended.
Criterion C
Loss of function is allowed, provided the function is
self-recoverable, or can be restored by the operation of the
controls by the user in accordance with the manufacturer’s
instructions.
Functions, and/or information stored in non-volatile memory, or
protected by a battery backup, shall not be lost.
self-recoverable, or can be restored by the operation of the
controls by the user in accordance with the manufacturer’s
instructions.
Functions, and/or information stored in non-volatile memory, or
protected by a battery backup, shall not be lost.
Report No:W-N-1002010-CY-01-1
Telecom Technology Center
7
5.1 Evaluation of sound quality
Sound Quality
The criterion of compliance with the requirement is a wanted
to unwanted audio signal ratio≧40 dB at a wanted audio
signal level of 50mW.
If the S/N ratio is less than 43dB,the performance criterion for
audio assessment is the actual S/N ratio minus 3dB.
For AM and FM car radios and for broadcast receiver cards for
computers the criterion is≧26dB at 500mW
to unwanted audio signal ratio≧40 dB at a wanted audio
signal level of 50mW.
If the S/N ratio is less than 43dB,the performance criterion for
audio assessment is the actual S/N ratio minus 3dB.
For AM and FM car radios and for broadcast receiver cards for
computers the criterion is≧26dB at 500mW
5.2 Evaluation of picture quality
Picture Quality
In the evaluation of picture interference the wanted test signal
produces a standard picture and unwanted signal produces a
degradation of the picture.
The criterion of compliance with the requirement is just
perceptible degradation by observation of the picture. The
screen shall be observed under normal viewing conditions, at a
viewing distance of six times the height of the screen
produces a standard picture and unwanted signal produces a
degradation of the picture.
The criterion of compliance with the requirement is just
perceptible degradation by observation of the picture. The
screen shall be observed under normal viewing conditions, at a
viewing distance of six times the height of the screen
Report No:W-N-1002010-CY-01-1
Telecom Technology Center
8
6. TEST RESULTS
6.1 INPUT IMMUNITY TEST (S1)
6.1.1 Description
According to EN 55020:2007, item 5.3, for Measurement of input immunity.
For this EUT is without antenna input port, there is no requirement for measuring
input immunity, and adverse signal do not occur.
For this EUT is without antenna input port, there is no requirement for measuring
input immunity, and adverse signal do not occur.
6.1.2 Test procedure
The test requirement was in accordance with EN 55020:2007, item 5.3
Click on the first or last page to see other ES 150PW (serv.man3) service manuals if exist.